atom feed36 messages in org.apache.commons.devRe: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lan...
FromSent OnAttachments
Benedikt RitterMay 17, 2017 9:02 am 
Gary GregoryMay 17, 2017 9:26 am 
Stephen ColebourneMay 17, 2017 9:59 am 
Pascal SchumacherMay 17, 2017 11:05 am 
Gary GregoryMay 17, 2017 11:44 am 
Benedikt RitterMay 17, 2017 1:41 pm 
Benedikt RitterMay 17, 2017 1:44 pm 
Matt SickerMay 17, 2017 2:26 pm 
Stephen ColebourneMay 17, 2017 2:39 pm 
Pascal SchumacherMay 17, 2017 2:55 pm 
Gary GregoryMay 17, 2017 4:43 pm 
Benedikt RitterMay 19, 2017 1:52 pm 
Gary GregoryMay 19, 2017 2:06 pm 
Bruno P. KinoshitaMay 20, 2017 2:07 am 
Benedikt RitterMay 21, 2017 7:53 am 
Jörg SchaibleMay 22, 2017 10:15 am 
Amey JadiyeMay 22, 2017 10:44 am 
Benedikt RitterMay 23, 2017 4:25 pm 
Gary GregoryMay 23, 2017 11:49 pm 
Jörg SchaibleMay 24, 2017 2:02 am 
Gary GregoryMay 24, 2017 2:26 am 
Gary GregoryMay 24, 2017 2:48 am 
Rob TompkinsMay 24, 2017 2:12 pm 
Gary GregoryMay 24, 2017 4:46 pm 
Gary GregoryMay 24, 2017 5:02 pm 
sebbMay 25, 2017 4:16 am 
Pascal SchumacherMay 25, 2017 5:03 am 
Benedikt RitterJun 5, 2017 3:54 am 
Matt SickerJun 5, 2017 7:52 am 
Bruno P. KinoshitaJun 6, 2017 3:08 am 
Bruno P. KinoshitaJun 6, 2017 4:45 am 
Benedikt RitterJun 6, 2017 11:12 am 
Amey JadiyeJun 8, 2017 8:55 am 
Gary GregoryJun 8, 2017 11:01 am 
Amey JadiyeJun 8, 2017 11:32 am 
Amey JadiyeJun 8, 2017 1:28 pm 
Subject:Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lang 3.6 based on RC2
From:Stephen Colebourne (scol@joda.org)
Date:May 17, 2017 2:39:57 pm
List:org.apache.commons.dev

On 17 May 2017 at 21:44, Benedikt Ritter <brit@apache.org> wrote:

Automatic-Module-Name: org.apache.commons.lang3

This allows other projects to safely depend on [lang3]. Ultimately, we'll have to add a module-info, but this is a much simpler first step.

It’s nice to see you being more active at Commons again! Given the fact the the
future of Jigsaw is currently completely unclear to me (since the EC has voted
no), I’m not to crazy about adding the required meta information. I’d like to
release 3.6 as soon as possible, so I propose to release 3.6.1 after 3.6 with
the fixed meta information.

The main thing will be getting a release with the metadata out once the spec is locked down. If you're happy to do a 3.6.1 within 2 months then that will work too. Ultimately it should either be one line, or one block, in pom.xml.

Stephen